Primary sources · The American founding

George Washington, Liberal

In his own words, 1774–1796

What we mean by liberal

Ownership held privately. Authority from below.

The right to rule comes from the people, and the government’s first job is to protect what each person owns, starting with himself. This is liberal in the original sense, not the party label.

The liberal corner of our compass

Download the PDFOne-page summary (PDF)

01

Authority from below

A few more of such flaming Arguments as were exhibited at Falmouth and Norfolk, added to the sound Doctrine, and unanswerable reasoning containd (in the pamphlet) Common Sense, will not leave numbers at a loss to decide upon the Propriety of a Seperation.

To Joseph Reed · 31 January 1776

Common Sense taught that government rises from the people to secure their freedom and that kingship is a sin, and Washington calls that sound doctrine.

The Citizens of America, placed in the most enviable condition, as the sole Lords and Proprietors of a vast Tract of Continent, comprehending all the various soils and climates of the World, and abounding with all the necessaries and conveniencies of life, are now by the late satisfactory pacification, acknowledged to be possessed of absolute freedom and Independency

Circular to the States · 8 June 1783

Lordship and ownership both rest with the citizens, which is the whole liberal corner in one phrase.

The foundation of our Empire was not laid in the gloomy age of Ignorance and Superstition, but at an Epocha when the rights of mankind were better understood and more clearly defined, than at any former period, the researches of the human mind, after social happiness, have been carried to a great extent, the Treasures of knowledge, acquired by the labours of Philosophers, Sages and Legislatures, through a long succession of years, are laid open for our use, and their collected wisdom may be happily applied in the Establishment of our forms of Government; the free cultivation of Letters, the unbounded extension of Commerce, the progressive refinement of Manners, the growing liberality of sentiment, and above all, the pure and benign light of Revelation, have had a meliorating influence on mankind and increased the blessings of Society. At this auspicious period, the United States came into existence as a Nation, and if their Citizens should not be completely free and happy, the fault will be intirely their own.

Circular to the States · 8 June 1783

Revelation is ranked among the influences that improved society, but the forms of government come from the philosophers’ wisdom about the rights of mankind, and the outcome rests on the citizens alone.

I am told that even respectable characters speak of a monarchical form of government without horror. … What a triumph for the advocates of despotism to find that we are incapable of governing ourselves, and that systems founded on the basis of equal liberty are merely ideal & falacious!

To John Jay · 15 August 1786

Monarchy is something to speak of with horror, and its return would prove that self-government on equal liberty had failed.

It is but the other day we were shedding our blood to obtain the Constitutions under which we now live—Constitutions of our own choice and framing—and now we are unsheathing the Sword to overturn them!

To David Humphreys · 26 December 1786

The constitutions are the people’s own choice and framing, which is authority built from below.

It is obviously impracticable in the fœderal Government Of these States to secure all Rights of independent Sovereignty to each and yet provide for the Interest and Safety of all—Individuals entering into Society must give up a Share of Liberty to preserve the Rest. The Magnitude of the Sacrifice must depend as well on Situations and Circumstances as on the Object to be obtained.

To the President of Congress, for the Convention · 17 September 1787

Society begins when individuals enter it and each surrenders a share of his liberty, which is the social contract in one sentence.

And as there is a Constitutional door open for it, I think the people (for it is with them to judge) can, as they will have the aid of experience on their side, decide with as much propriety on the alterations and amendments wch shall be found necessary, as ourselves; for I do not conceive that we are more inspired—have more wisdem—or possess more virtue than those who will come after us.

To Bushrod Washington · 9 November 1787

The people judge their own constitution, and the founders claim no authority above the people who come after them.

The power under the Constitution will always be with the people. It is entrusted for certain defined purposes and for a certain limited period to representatives of their own chusing; and whenever it is exercised contrary to their interests, or not according to their wishes, their Servants can, and undoubtedly will be, recalled.

To Bushrod Washington · 9 November 1787

Power belongs to the people, officeholders carry it for a term as their servants, and the people recall them at will.

With regard to the two great points (the pivots on which the whole machine must move) my Creed is simply:
1st That the general Government is not invested with more Powers than are indispensably necessary to perform [the] functions of a good Government; and, consequently, that no objection ought to be made against the quantity of Power delegated to it.
2ly That these Powers (as the appointment of all Rulers will forever arise from, and, at short stated intervals, recur to the free suffrage of the People) are so distributed among the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches, into which the general Government is arranged, that it can never be in danger of degenerating into a monarcchy [sic], an Oligarchy, an Aristocracy, or any other despotic or oppressive form; so long as there shall remain any virtue in the body of the People.

To Lafayette · 7 February 1788

He calls this his creed: power is delegated, every ruler’s appointment comes from the people’s vote and returns to it on a schedule, and monarchy sits in the list of despotic forms.

Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station; it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official Act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the Universe, who presides in the Councils of Nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that his benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the People of the United States, a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes

First Inaugural Address · 30 April 1789

He takes office in obedience to the public’s summons and asks God to bless a government the people instituted themselves, so authority runs upward and the blessing is requested afterward.

And in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their United Government, the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities, from which the event has resulted, cannot be compared with the means by which most Governments have been established, without some return of pious gratitude along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage.

First Inaugural Address · 30 April 1789

The government’s origin is voluntary consent, and he holds that origin up against the way most governments began.

the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the Republican model of Government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.

First Inaugural Address · 30 April 1789

Self-government is an experiment, and its keeping is in the people’s hands.

We have Reason to rejoice in the prospect that the present National Government, which by the favor of Divine Providence, was formed by the common Counsels, and peaceably established with the common consent of the People, will prove a blessing to every denomination of them.

To the Society of Quakers · 13 October 1789

Providence receives thanks for its favor, but the government’s forming and establishing belong to the people’s counsels and consent.

In one in which the measures of Government receive their impression so immediately from the sense of the Community as in ours it [knowledge] is proportionably essential. To the security of a free Constitution it contributes in various ways: By convincing those who are intrusted with the public administration, that every valuable end of Government is best answered by the enlightened confidence of the people: and by teaching the people themselves to know and to value their own rights; to discern and provide against invasions of them; to distinguish between oppression and the necessary exercise of lawful authority

First Annual Message to Congress · 8 January 1790

Government takes its direction from the sense of the community, and the people are taught to judge for themselves where lawful authority ends and oppression begins.

The establishment of our new Government seemed to be the last great experiment, for promoting human happiness, by reasonable compact, in civil Society. It was to be, in the first instance, in a considerable degree, a government of accomodation as well as a government of Laws.

To Catharine Macaulay Graham · 9 January 1790

Government is a compact that men reason their way into, and America is its great test.

It has ever been my pride to merit the approbation of my fellow citizens, by a faithful and honest discharge of the duties annexed to those stations in which they have been pleased to place me; and the dearest rewards of my services have been those testimonies of esteem and confidence with which they have honored me.

To the New Jerusalem Church of Baltimore · 27 January 1793

His fellow citizens placed him in his offices, and he measures his service by their approval.

This government, the offspring of our own choice uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and your support.

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

The government’s claim on the citizen rests on its being the citizens’ own choice.

Respect for its authority, compliance with its Laws, acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true Liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, ’till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole People, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the People to establish Government presupposes the duty of every Individual to obey the established Government.

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

The individual’s duty to obey comes from the people’s power to establish government, so both the source of authority and the duty that answers it sit with the people.

They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force—to put in the place of the delegated will of the Nation, the will of a party … they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the Power of the People, & to usurp for themselves the reins of Government

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

Law is the nation’s delegated will, and usurpation means taking from the people a power that is theirs.

If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

The people’s opinion judges how power is distributed, and amendment is their standing means of redistributing it.

that the free constitution, which is the work of your hands, may be sacredly maintained

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

The Constitution is the people’s own handiwork, to be kept as sacred.

02

Ownership held privately

we should then be asking a favour, & not claiming a Right wch by the Law of Nature & our Constitution we are, in my opinion, indubitably entitled to; I should even think it criminal to go further than this, under such an Idea; but none such I have, I think the Parliament of Great Britain hath no more Right to put their hands into my Pocket, without my consent, than I have to put my hands into your’s, for money

To Bryan Fairfax · 20 July 1774

By the law of nature no one may take a man’s property without his consent, which puts both halves of the liberal definition in one sentence.

every private soldier will detest, and abhor such practices, when he considers, that it is for the preservat[i]on of his own Rights, Liberty and Property, and those of his Fellow Countrymen, that he is now called into service: that it is unmanly and sully’s the dignity of the great cause, in which we are all engaged, to violate that property, he is called to protect

General Orders · 5 July 1775

In his first week of command, he tells the army what it exists for: each man’s rights, liberty, and property.

The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them.

General Orders · 2 July 1776

Two days before the Declaration, he names the stakes as freedom and property a man can call his own.

I cannot avoid reflecting with pleasure on the probable influence that commerce may here after have on human manners & society in general. On these occasions I consider how mankind may be connected like one great family in fraternal ties—I endulge a fond, perhaps an enthusiastic idea, that as the world is evidently much less barbarous than it has been, its melioration must still be progressive—that nations are becoming more humanized in their policy—that the subjects of ambition & causes for hostility are daily diminishing—and in fine, that the period is not very remote when the benefits of a liberal & free commerce will, pretty generally, succeed to the devastations & horrors of war.

To Lafayette · 15 August 1786

Free commerce among private owners is his hope for peace among nations, which is the economic side of the liberal corner.

Influence is no government. Let us have one by which our lives, liberties, and properties will be secured, or let us know the worst at once.

To Henry Lee Jr. · 31 October 1786

Government is defined by what it secures, each man’s life, liberty, and property, which is Locke’s list of its ends (Second Treatise §123).

What stronger evidence can be given of the want of energy in our governments than these disorders? If there exists not a power to check them, what security has a man of life, liberty, or property?

To James Madison · 5 November 1786

He wrote this right after relaying Henry Knox’s report that the Massachusetts insurgents held that the nation’s property ought to be the common property of all, and his remedy is a government strong enough to secure what each man owns.

Liberty itself will find in such a Government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest Guardian. It is indeed little else than a name, where the Government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the Society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

Government’s task is to keep every man secure in the rights of his person and his property, which is the second half of the definition almost word for word.

Harmony, liberal intercourse with all Nations, are recommended by policy, humanity and interest. But even our Commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand: neither seeking nor granting exclusive favours or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing & diversifying by gentle means the streams of Commerce, but forcing nothing

Farewell Address · 19 September 1796

Trade follows the natural course of private exchange, and the government’s part is to favor no one and force nothing.

03

Starting with himself

With respect to the advice given by the Author—to suspect the Man, who shall recommend moderate measures and longer forbearance—I spurn it—as every Man, who regards that liberty, & reveres that Justice for which we contend, undoubtedly must—for if Men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind; reason is of no use to us—the freedom of Speech may be taken away—and, dumb & silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.

To the Officers of the Army, Newburgh · 15 March 1783

Each man’s freedom to voice his own judgment is the condition of public reason, the liberty Mill would put at the center of On Liberty.

If I could have entertained the slightest apprehension that the Constitution framed in the Convention, where I had the honor to preside, might possibly endanger the religious rights of any ecclesiastical Society, certainly I would never have placed my signature to it; and if I could now conceive that the general Government might ever be so administered as to render the liberty of conscience insecure, I beg you will be persuaded that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution—For you, doubtless, remember that I have often expressed my sentiment, that every man, conducting himself as a good citizen, and being accountable to God alone for his religious opinions, ought to be protected in worshipping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience.

To the United Baptist Churches of Virginia · May 1789

Each man answers to God alone for his religion, and the government’s part is to protect his worship, not to judge it.

Government being, among other purposes, instituted to protect the Persons and Consciences of men from oppression, it certainly is the duty of Rulers, not only to abstain from it themselves, but according to their Stations, to prevent it in others.

To the Society of Quakers · 13 October 1789

Government is instituted to protect what each man owns of himself, his person and his conscience.

The liberty enjoyed by the People of these States, of worshipping Almighty God agreable to their Consciences, is not only among the choicest of their Blessings, but also of their Rights—While men perform their social Duties faithfully, they do all that Society or the State can with propriety demand or expect; and remain responsible only to their Maker for the Religion or modes of faith which they may prefer or profess.

To the Society of Quakers · 13 October 1789

Worship is a right, and the state’s claim on a man stops at his social duties.

the path of true piety is so plain as to require but little political direction. To this consideration we ought to ascribe the absence of any regulation, respecting religion, from the Magna-Charta of our country. To the guidance of the ministers of the gospel this important object is, perhaps, more properly committed

To the Presbyterian Ministers of Massachusetts and New Hampshire · 2 November 1789

The Presbytery had written that they wished the Constitution contained an explicit acknowledgment of “the only true God and Jesus Christ,” and Washington answers that the silence is deliberate, religion being the ministers’ charge and not the government’s.

As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow, that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the Community are equally entitled to the protection of civil Government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality.

To Roman Catholics in America · c. 15 March 1790

Civil protection is owed equally to everyone who conducts himself well, whatever his church.

The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship[.] It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.

To the Hebrew Congregation in Newport · 18 August 1790

Liberty of conscience is an inherent natural right that government protects rather than grants, and the government asks nothing of any religion except good citizenship.

We have abundant reason to rejoice, that in this land the light of truth and reason have triumphed over the power of bigotry and superstition, and that every person may here worship God according to the dictates of his own heart. In this enlightened age and in this land of equal liberty, it is our boast, that a man’s religious tenets will not forfeit the protection of the laws, nor deprive him of the right of attaining and holding the highest offices that are known in the United States.

To the New Jerusalem Church of Baltimore · 27 January 1793

A man’s religion has no bearing on his protection under law or his eligibility for the highest office.

Sources

Texts and editions

Washington

The Papers of George Washington, Colonial, Revolutionary War, Confederation, and Presidential Series (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press), as published at Founders Online, National Archives (founders.archives.gov). All letters, orders, and addresses not listed below.

To James Madison, 5 November 1786: The Papers of James Madison, Congressional Series, vol. 9, as published at Founders Online.

First Inaugural Address, 30 April 1789: transcription of the original, Records of the U.S. Senate, Record Group 46, National Archives.

First Annual Message to Congress, 8 January 1790: text as published by the Miller Center, University of Virginia.

Circular to the States, 8 June 1783: John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745–1799 (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1931–44), 26:484–89.

Referenced

Thomas Paine, Common Sense (Philadelphia, 1776).

John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (1689), Second Treatise §123.

John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859), ch. 2.

Published by Beyond Left and Right. Spelling, capitals, and punctuation are Washington’s as transcribed; brackets are editorial, [sic] marks a slip in the source, and an ellipsis marks omitted words. The Bushrod Washington letter follows the copy he received, dated 9 November, not the letter-book copy of 10 November that is usually quoted. Some documents were drafted with help: Hamilton wrote most of the Farewell Address, Madison’s editors believe he composed the first inaugural, Jefferson may have drafted the Newport reply, which echoes the congregation’s own address, and the 17 September 1787 letter spoke for the whole Convention. Each is quoted as a document Washington issued over his own signature. Correspondence: contact@beyondleftandright.com

Download the PDFOne-page summary (PDF)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *